Posted by: Anonymous
well, thanksalot iran
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 07/06/07 01:35 PM
I'm shocked.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 07/06/07 01:47 PM
This has been suspected for a long time.
I'm sure the UN will pass another meaningless resolution against Iran.
Iran has an intelligent, laregely westernized populous. The fact they allow such hard line clerical governement to exist is baffling to me. The problem is not the Iranian people, but there needs to be some assassinations among the nutcase shiite clerics in control of the country.
This quote was priceless:
Maybe we should make it clear to them that we have the capability to make life worse for Iran.
We'd have to be covert on this one though because we can't afford to reconstruct another country.
I'm sure the UN will pass another meaningless resolution against Iran.
Iran has an intelligent, laregely westernized populous. The fact they allow such hard line clerical governement to exist is baffling to me. The problem is not the Iranian people, but there needs to be some assassinations among the nutcase shiite clerics in control of the country.
This quote was priceless:
Quote:
"I think their goal is to make it very clear that Iran has the capability to make life worse for the United States on a variety of fronts," said Seth Jones of the Rand Institute, "even if they have to do some business with a group that has historically been their enemy."
We'd have to be covert on this one though because we can't afford to reconstruct another country.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 07/06/07 02:02 PM
I know this may be shocking, but I can't find anything to argue with in desert_rat's post.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 07/06/07 05:46 PM
It's a Proxy War. I know I'm right, I read it in People.
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 08/06/07 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by mine_man:
I know this may be shocking, but I can't find anything to argue with in desert_rat's post.
I know this may be shocking, but I can't find anything to argue with in desert_rat's post.
Posted by: RedX
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 08/06/07 08:26 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Kanter:
It's a Proxy War. I know I'm right, I read it in People.
It's a Proxy War. I know I'm right, I read it in People.
![[LOL]](graemlins/lol.gif)
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 08/06/07 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by mine_man:
I know this may be shocking, but I can't find anything to argue with in desert_rat's post.
I know this may be shocking, but I can't find anything to argue with in desert_rat's post.
What the hell is going on....
Posted by: Anonymous
Re: well, thanksalot iran - 08/06/07 10:15 AM
Yep, I had to change my user name. A recent series of events has changed my views a little bit as well. It was in a thread a little while ago, before I deleted mosts posts. If you want to know what happened I will PM you when I get a chance.
I like how you said this: "Iran has an intelligent, laregely westernized populous. The fact they allow such hard line clerical governement to exist is baffling to me. The problem is not the Iranian people". I completely agree.
I have always thought Iran's leadership was a SEVERE threat to America and Isreal, and the general stability of the region. I may not have said it before, but thats the truth.
I like how you said this: "Iran has an intelligent, laregely westernized populous. The fact they allow such hard line clerical governement to exist is baffling to me. The problem is not the Iranian people". I completely agree.
I have always thought Iran's leadership was a SEVERE threat to America and Isreal, and the general stability of the region. I may not have said it before, but thats the truth.