Compression ratio in the V-6 X's

Posted by: H_and_Ds_X

Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 12:02 AM

I am wondering why Nissan uses a compression ratio of 8.9:1 in both the superchargered VG33E and the normally aspirated VG33E. Is it just an ease of manufacturing? Using a higher compression ratio in the non-supercharged V-6 would increase power and efficiency of the engine which would help the only weak link I have found on the X. If you know why they don't bump up the compression, let me in on the secret.

------------------
Posted by: H_and_Ds_X

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 12:04 AM

That is if I'm not mistaken and they are both actually 8.9:1.

------------------
Posted by: XOC

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 03:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by H_and_Ds_X:
If you know why they don't bump up the compression, let me in on the secret.


Probably because the engine is 15 years old.

------------------
Regards,
Ian
Posted by: ElectroKen

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 04:25 AM

If the normally-aspirated VG33E had any higher compression it would almost certainly need premium fuel. People don't like hearing that these days unless they are buying something intended to be high performance. My '84 VF1100S has 10.5:1 compression and pings like mad on anything less than 92 octane.

------------------
Posted by: H_and_Ds_X

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 11:45 AM

Does the Frontier require more than unleaded regular to prevent pre-detonation?

------------------
Posted by: OffroadX

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 08/08/01 11:46 AM

Same engine. Nope. If it's supercharged, it will need premium though.

Brent
Posted by: *paul

Re: Compression ratio in the V-6 X's - 09/08/01 03:23 PM

Here's a list of vehicle engines sold in the N. American market. That 8.9:1 seems to be about as low as it goes.

http://www.wardsauto.com/docs/Mahle2001.pdf