After looking over the bills, I conclude that almost everything WND is saying will be true down the road based on these bills.

The wording of the bills don't contain the wording of the WND article, but that isn't the point. They don't have to contain that wording.

These bills will be the basis and blueprint for new policy going forward.

For example.... Someone will sue the school district because they think those terms such as "Mom and Dad" are discriminatory against gay couples. Based on this legislation, the CA courts will agree.

I don't see anything that WND claims that is not possible under the laws.