Quote:
Originally posted by NY Madman:
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:

[b]Show me where it says ANY of what WND is claiming.
After looking over the bills, I conclude that almost everything WND is saying will be true down the road based on these bills.

The wording of the bills don't contain the wording of the WND article, but that isn't the point. They don't have to contain that wording.

These bills will be the basis and blueprint for new policy going forward.

For example.... Someone will sue the school district because they think those terms such as "Mom and Dad" are discriminatory against gay couples. Based on this legislation, the CA courts will agree.

I don't see anything that WND claims that is not possible under the laws.[/b]
The fact remains, Madman...that the WND flat out lies. In particular the line I highlighted before:

Quote:
There are no similar protections for students with traditional or conservative lifestyles and beliefs, however.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist