Quote:
Originally posted by Carlton McMillan:
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:
[b]Not that I'm trying to get into any of this argument, (I personally think using it once constitutes fair use, but Carlton, you've repeatedly used it)...

"[/b]
But there is no limit impossed by the law stating that an image can not be used in fair use repeatedly. And seeing as I am not gaining monatary gain from the posting it can not be considered commercial usage nor am I degrading the "value" of the image by reposting.

When it comes down to it.. Oleg is just upset that he did something stupid and it was caught on film for all to see. [Freak]

But that is not what this post is about... it is a farewell roast for Oleg the terrible.

edited to add..
There must be a stong brotherhood of MAXC members because it always seems to me that the only people that get upset about seeing Oleg with his Xterra on it side are members from that club. Sounds like the basis of a good conspiracy.. What else are you guys hiding over there? laugh [/b]
Agreed that you aren't devaluing (sp?) the shot. There is no monetary value to it, imo. The "repeated" thing is just my own opinion, obviously someone might be able to use it over and over repeatedly.

I'm not upset you used it. I personally couldn't care less. I can understand Steinism not liking it, it's his shot after all. Oleg's the only one that raises a ruckus when it gets displayed. But can you blame him? There's been other shots of people who rolled, but they don't get displayed over and over. I know you and Oleg had some sort of row at some point, and really, you use this picture only to take jabs at him. (That's why I don't blame him for getting pissy about it).
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist