Quote:
Originally posted by FANOF5:
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:
[b]
Quote:
Originally posted by FANOF5:
[b]And if Saddam did use Weapons of Mass Destruction and we did not stop it, then you would be bashing the government and blaming them for thousands of deaths........this is getting boring!!!!!!!
He already did. Why didn't Reagan do anything about that?[/b]
What do you mean he already did, supposedly, according to all the EXPERTS here, he does not have weapons of mass destruction.......Maybe Reagan was more concerned about the Cold War....[/b]
Apparently you've never heard about the stuff he pulled on Iran during their 10 year war? Go get a newspaper...they do have something other than comics and sports.

And yeah, Reagan was concerned about the cold war. But also what was going on in the middle east. After all, his underlings pulled the Contra trade shit. And don't say, "Reagan didn't know," That's no excuse. Truman said it best. "The buck stops here."
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist