Originally posted by lincolnnellie:
Originally posted by Chato:
[b]But if you're against having any form of religious statements in those State Facilities, then you're against Freedom of Speech, which is entirely different then the Separation of Church and State issue.
I am actually excercising my right of freedom of speech by being against having any form of religious statments in state facilities. I am not loooking to start a big religion debate, but why not have writings from Mohammed, Zeus, or David Koresh? All religons are based on faith and not real facts. If I have faith that I believe that a bananna is a god and I worship it, should I be able to have a bannana peal or a Chiquita sticker in a court house? Law is based on fact, not that we belive you are guilty so you are automaticaly guilty. The 10 commandments have no place in the court. This is a trial by peers, not a trial by god! The definition of one of the 10 commandments, keep the sabath, was changed by the church...thus breaking the 10 commandments.
Sunday is not the sabath [/b]Wrong, thanks for playing. What isn't real and factual about the Bible? Except for the big faith things, almost everything has been proven. You better wake up and do some research instead of running your mouth on ideas brought on out of your lack of understanding.
The Ten Commandments have no place in court. The dumbest comment yet. Our laws were written with the Ten Commandments as the backbone. That's like saying you can swim in the pool, but don't touch the water.