Quote:
Originally posted by 2001frontier:
The offense is not the point. He did something that would land me or you in jail. You can be disengenuous about it all day long. The fact still remains that he lied under oath. I am not a Republican anyway so that little desperate shot doesn't really mean much to me.
Look, Tripp obtained the evidence illegally under the watchful gaze of not only Ken Starr, but also of Michael Isikoff from Newsweek, a supposedly "liberal" publication. The blow job had NOTHING to do with Whitewater, which is what Starr was SUPPOSED to be investigating. If this was a case in court, Starr would never have been able to ask the question because it had nothing to do with the case at hand. Clinton wasn't on trial for his private life, but you conservatives continue to say "Oh, he lied under oath." So what? In a court of law, the question would have never been asked.

Quote:
Originally posted by 2001frontier:
This whole argument is apples and oranges anyway. Clinton lied and we know this, and we don't know if Bush did or not. Pretty simple, huh?
Well, we're pretty sure he did. No less than eight people have come forward and said they told him that the evidence was weak. But he went ahead and told us we were in danger. So we go to war, and our soldiers are dying because of faked and untrue evidence that he KNEW was untrue.

Not only that, but he sold out the British and blamed them for the bad evidence, and the BRITISH ARE OUR BEST FRIENDS IN THE WORLD RIGHT NOW. The man would probably sell his daughters into slavery if it meant it would save his skin.

He's dirty, evil, and will lose the election in 2004. Face it, Cons. Your emperor has no clothes.