#208270 - 30/09/0301:48 PMRe: Who Is Lying about US involvement in Iraq?
Anonymous
Unregistered
Ok, now you pissed me off. Your ignorance is astounding.
Quote:
So what? You are as morally bankrupt as he is. Whether the question should have been asked or not isn't the issue. He hung himself by lying.
He wouldn't have lied had Starr never asked the question, which he never should have been allowed to do because IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INVESTIGATION!!!
Quote:
Your argument is crumbling already because it is based on conjecture and supposed facts with no evidence to support these 'facts'. Were is your proof that he KNEW anything.
You are one of those BUSH KNEW about 9/11 morons aren't you?
When a Minnesota FBI operative on the Bin Laden task force writes a memo that says "Hey! They're going to fly planes into targets here in the US" and it's ignored...well, what would you call that?
Quote:
Are you talking about the Nigeria uranium claim? If so, you are as disengenuous as the rest of your ilk.
The only one still holding onto this claim is Dick Cheney, and he's insane. Even Rumsfeld says there's no link between 9/11 and Iraq.
Quote:
In the SOTU address Bush said "According to British Intelligence".
That's because he knew WALKING INTO THE CHAMBER that the evidence was wrong. They had TOLD HIM THREE DRAFTS EARLIER that the evidence was bad. Yet he still said it, and said that the British gave us the evidence. That's because he KNEW it was bad, and was giving him a way out. Does that explain it well enough for you, Cletus?
Quote:
Unfortunately extreme leftists such as yourself are killing the Democratic party for years to come.
Extreme conservatives such as yourself drove me from the Republican party. Either that or I became educated when I turned fifteen.