Quote:
I am wetting my pants Nancy.
Mr Reagan? Is that you?

Quote:
Libbie op-ed pieces aren't proof idiot.
Then why do you conservatives take everything Bill O'Reilly says as the Gospel?

Quote:
Most of the intelligence was the same that Clinton used to bomb Iraq in '98.
And if I remember right, you conservatives screamed bloody murder when he did it too. Why is it ok with one President, but not the other? Please tell me, Sally. I'm waiting.

Quote:
I would call that you being an idiot for buying into the conspiracy.
WHAT CONSPIRACY, DUMMY?? SHE TESTIFIED ON CAPITOL HILL!!!
Were you born an ostrich, or do you just like to bury your head in the sand for fun?

Quote:
He specifically said that we don't know if Saddam was involved. The administration never said we were to begin with.
So then, please tell me genius, what are we fighting a war over there for, then? That was the reason we a) went to the UN and told them that Iraq was in bed with the terrorists, B) that we were in imminent danger from the WMD's that they had, and c) any day now, Saddam was going to attack us.
We attacked them as a pre-imptive strike. If it wasn't about terrorists, then PLEASE tell me what it was for.

Quote:
He never said the British gave us the intelligence. He said it was according to them.
Good God, you conservatives play these word games so much...
WHAT IS THE F*CKING DIFFERENCE?? "According to them..." Doesn't that IMPLY that the British gave us that intelligence?? At the very LEAST it implies it.

Quote:
I took it to mean that our agency had no reliable evidence for it.
So then why was it in the State of the Union? If they had no reliable evidence about it, it shouldn't have even been mentioned.

Quote:
The fact that Saddam had bought uranium before from them is always conveniently left out when you extremist libbies bring this up.
Do you know this for sure, or is this just ACCORDING to you?

Quote:
Oh, if we all could be as 'enlightened' and 'progressive' as you. You extreme leftists just think you have it all figured out don't you.
Well, don't we? I mean, look how well off we were in the 90's under Clinton. If Bush is so good, how come jobs keep disappearing?