Quote:
Originally posted by 2001frontier:
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:
[b]
Quote:
Originally posted by 2001frontier:
[b]I just figured you ignored the rest of it because it was typical assinine libbie horse shit. confused
And it's typical conservative behavior to not explain WHY it's typical assinine libbie horse shit. Just like Franken's claims. I have said it before - I don't doubt he is spinning, BUT I have yet to see a conservative explain away each of his claims. It's always, "Oh, he's lying" or "it was typical assinine libbie horse shit."

The only issue they latch on to is the Harvard letterhead - which he already acknowledged and apologized for...which I can't say for O'Reilly's false claim about the Polk award, nor any of Coulter's ramblings, nor any of Hannity's spewing.[/b]
I don't know what you are talking about here. I was responding as to the reason Madman did not respond to the rest of our new resident socialist's post. Did you read the rest of my post, or did you just see that line and respond?[/b]
Damn man...bringing up older posts that I know have to search for! Damn you! :p

I'm just saying how I've yet to see a conservative on here say WHY the liberal arguments are wrong. All I ever see is "you're wrong" or whatnot. Give us FACTS. I'll give you a good example...

Franken's book. All I ever see from conservatives is that it is full of lies. Did they read it? "Hell, no....I'll never read that drivel." If you don't read it, how can you POSSIBLY refute it?

It smacks of the same reaction when Last Temptation of Christ came out - all these people denouncing it...BEFORE IT EVEN WAS RELEASED. How about they watch it first, THEN come out with reasons why it sucked?
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist