Alright, I really hate to jump into this but I need something clarified for myself.

More acrticulation generally means more droop, more traction, more stability on the trail, right? (To a point, of course, as there are always exremes we are not going to talk about).

RTI ramp scores are ultimately dependant on articulation and traction of the rig, true?

So, if a rig gets high RTI scores it means that it can artululate well, keep tires on the ground with traction and be stable. Given that, my logic is that the rig should be stable in most offroad cituations, no more or less than any other rig with a similar COG and suspension setup. No?

Granted no offroad cituation is the same, there are always variations and there are always risks so it's hard to precicely test the revolvers.

Am I off with my logic, maybe?