shrockworks xterraparts
XOC Decal
Newest Members
Glim, ChossWrangler, Patman, ChargedX, Randy Howerton
10084 Registered Users
Recent Posts
Shout Box

Who's Online
0 registered (), 50 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#598430 - 05/05/08 07:42 AM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:

But those profits they made - the 30 Billion...is AFTER taxes. I think you'd be hard pressed to find any individual who even comes close to a fraction of that. All the richest people (namely Gates and Buffett) are getting their worth on paper only. They aren't profiting those billions.
Who cares how much profit they make. Since when is it any of your business? Since when is it any of the business of any politician? Since when is "profit" a dirty word?

If oil companies made $30 billion in profits, that means they paid far in excess of $30 billion in taxes.

Plus, those profits go to pay shareholder dividends and the bulk of the money is re-invested back into the business to develop oil and natural gas resources. You think it is cheap to pull oil and gas from the ground or the ocean?

Since 1992 the oil industry has invested $1.2 trillion of those profits you people complain about back into oil and gas development. That's TRILLION with a "T".

If they didn't have that money to constantly re-invest back into the business, who would be doing that investment to make sure the oil kept flowing? The government?

You people believe and repeat any type of populist, bullshit, socialist rhetoric any candidate throws in your direction without giving it any further thought.

Politicians treat the public like idiots. That doesn't mean you have to make an effort to prove them correct.

Top
#598431 - 05/05/08 07:57 AM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Some more realism as compared to the bullshit being espoused.....

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120977019142563957.html?mod=opinion_main_review_and_outlooks

Quote:
Exxon's profits are soaring with the recent oil price spike, but the energy industry's earnings aren't as outsized as the politicians seem to think. Thomson Financial calculates that profits from the oil and natural gas industry over the past year were 8.3% of investment, while the all-industry average is 7.8%. And this was a boom year for oil. An analysis by the Cato Institute's Jerry Taylor finds that between 1970 and 2003 (which includes peak and valley years for earnings) the oil and gas business was "less profitable than the rest of the U.S. economy." These are hardly robber barons.

This tiff over gas and oil taxes only highlights the intellectual policy confusion – or perhaps we should say cynicism – of our politicians. They want lower prices but don't want more production to increase supply. They want oil "independence" but they've declared off limits most of the big sources of domestic oil that could replace foreign imports. They want Americans to use less oil to reduce greenhouse gases but they protest higher oil prices that reduce demand. They want more oil company investment but they want to confiscate the profits from that investment. And these folks want to be President?
Read the whole thing. For an industry that has a little over 8% return, they get beaten over the head a lot for sheer propaganda reasons.

And the idiots buy it.

Top
#598432 - 05/05/08 08:55 AM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NuDan Offline
Member

Registered: 19/08/01
Posts: 500
Loc: Not Here
FYI, Oil Sands:
“Second only to the Saudi Arabia reserves, Alberta's oil sands deposits were described by Time Magazine as "Canada's greatest buried energy treasure," and "could satisfy the world's demand for petroleum for the next century".

Oil Sands are deposits of bitumen, a molasses-like viscous oil that will not flow unless heated or diluted with lighter hydrocarbons. They are contained in three major areas beneath 140,200* square kilometres of north-eastern Alberta - an area larger than the state of Florida, an area twice the size of New Brunswick, more than four and half times the size of Vancouver Island, and 26 times larger than Prince Edward Island. However, only about two per cent of the initial established resource has been produced to date.”

Link to Info

Alberta has no provincial sales tax and is the fastest growing province economically and socially in Canada.
In comparison Ontario has an 8% sales tax.
New Brunswick residents are taxed 13% by the province.

A typical McDonald’s employee in Fort MacMurray, Alberta makes $14.75/hour.
A typical McDonald’s employee in Cornwall, Ontario makes $7.75/hour ($8.75/hour as of March 1).

Ottawa, Ontario: regular gas $1.19/liter = $4.52/Gallon

Calgary, Alberta: regular gas $1.25/liter = $4.75/Gallon

Montreal, Quebec: regular gas $1.34/liter = $5.01/Gallon

New York, NY: regular gas: $3.77/Gallon

Los Angeles, CA: regular gas: $3.75/Gallon

You think YOU’RE being fucked by your government?!
_________________________
There are 10 types of people in the world...those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Top
#598433 - 05/05/08 09:58 AM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Not quite related, but interesting...

Just one example.

There's tons of information on this, just look...

My brother and I plan on building one of these contraptions, but in the plans it specifically stated that using it on a modern (Computer controlled) engine would not do any good. I guess the computer messes with the mixture and negates the gains. I have an old Baja that we'll use, if we get a good working setup.

Anyways, if we could find more ways to reduce consumption without hurting the environment or Economy, I'm for it, but still skeptical as people are just going to jump into the latest Tornado or "Performance Chip" (Resistor) without doing all the research to see if there is any benefit.

Top
#598434 - 05/05/08 01:02 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:
Not quite related, but interesting...

Just one example.

There's tons of information on this, just look...

My brother and I plan on building one of these contraptions, but in the plans it specifically stated that using it on a modern (Computer controlled) engine would not do any good. I guess the computer messes with the mixture and negates the gains. I have an old Baja that we'll use, if we get a good working setup.

Anyways, if we could find more ways to reduce consumption without hurting the environment or Economy, I'm for it, but still skeptical as people are just going to jump into the latest Tornado or "Performance Chip" (Resistor) without doing all the research to see if there is any benefit.
I'm pretty sure that most of those sorts of things are bogus. If it's some random plans from the intratubes, I'd avoid it unless I can get some sort of viable and actually scientific proof.

Top
#598435 - 05/05/08 02:09 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


I just wanted to clear up some confusion on basic economics in the oil industry.

1. Oil supply is controlled by a cartel (OPEC). This is a group of oil producers who get together and determine how much they will produce in order to control the price through supply manipulation. They are acting almost like a monopoly, except that they control the price by supply rather than directly setting the price. These countries could increase oil production, but why would they increase supply to drop the price to $28/barrel when people are willing to pay $120/barrel?

2. The supply of oil has not changed significantly since the start of the Iraq war. The current prices are largely being driven by speculation-people are buying oil futures with the expectation that the price tomorrow will be higher than the price today. It becomes a self-fullfilling prophecy through their continued investments. This market is based more upon fear than supply/demand and rational thought.

3. Exxon Mobile had record company profits of 10.9 billion dollars in the first quarter of this year. They paid over 29 billion dollars in federal taxes during this same 3 month period. This means that they only made $1 for every $3 they paid in taxes. And we want to tax them more? It was mentioned earlier that companies pass new costs on to the consumer. Taxing oil companies' profits will NOT drop the price of gasoline, they will pass this increased cost to the consumer--you and me.

4. If you look at Exxon's filings with the SEC, only 8% of their income came from gasoline sales and refining. 92% of their income came from selling oil for other petroleum based products such as plastics. That's right, they made more money from that water bottle you're drinking out of than that last gallon of gas you bought. Gasoline is just the scapegoat.

Oil companies make a lot of money. But, they pay a lot of taxes. The price that you are paying at the pump is not controlled by Exxon, as Hillary would have you believe, but by OPEC and the speculators who are buying oil futures today.

Top
#598436 - 05/05/08 02:29 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Gasoline is also made more expensive because of these fucking different "blends" that the refineries have to create.... in very few refineries.

One state has a different blend than the neighboring state. It's bullshit.

We also have states like California that also want to force the automakers to make cars for that state to different mileage and emissions standards than the federal standards. If that is allowed to happen, think what that will do to the price of vehicles.

It's almost like in the 1800's when railroads were first invented. Different and competing companies at first used different gauge tracks. People realized the lack of a nationwide standard would impede and inhibit growth.

Top
#598437 - 05/05/08 02:50 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


To Jorge's point, the devalued dollar is doing a lot to impact this too since that's the currency used by oil markets.

Bullshit like this tax credit and bailing out bad lenders and stupid borrowers is making that much worse too.

Top
#598438 - 05/05/08 03:01 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by Ron ap Rhys:
Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:
[b]Not quite related, but interesting...

Just one example.

There's tons of information on this, just look...

My brother and I plan on building one of these contraptions, but in the plans it specifically stated that using it on a modern (Computer controlled) engine would not do any good. I guess the computer messes with the mixture and negates the gains. I have an old Baja that we'll use, if we get a good working setup.

Anyways, if we could find more ways to reduce consumption without hurting the environment or Economy, I'm for it, but still skeptical as people are just going to jump into the latest Tornado or "Performance Chip" (Resistor) without doing all the research to see if there is any benefit.
I'm pretty sure that most of those sorts of things are bogus. If it's some random plans from the intratubes, I'd avoid it unless I can get some sort of viable and actually scientific proof.[/b]
Point taken and as I said, I'm skeptical, but hopefull laugh

I'll let everyone know when I get something worth posting, but until then... [Wave]

Now where can I get one of those Performance Chips? [LOL]

Top
#598439 - 05/05/08 03:04 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Desert_Rat:

To Jorge's point, the devalued dollar is doing a lot to impact this too since that's the currency used by oil markets.

Bullshit like this tax credit and bailing out bad lenders and stupid borrowers is making that much worse too.
The housing bailout is another problem that Congress is getting involved with that will ultimately have unintended consequences that the taxpayers will again be fucked.

There are very few sentient, intelligent beings in Congress and the majority of our society's problems are because of Congress.... and the consequences of their actions.

They are voting on more housing bailout this week I believe. The taxpayers will be in the bag for well in excess of an additional $300 billion in bad mortgages plus everyone who owns 401K's and mutual funds will be taking a hit because the market is going to have to absorb billions of dollars in losses mandated by Congress.

The devalued dollar and the futures market on oil is also being manipulated by overseas and international interests because of politics.

We are now in the age where international entities can manipulate the US economy and maybe even have a dangerous amount of control over it than we do ourselves.

Top
#598440 - 05/05/08 03:06 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:

Point taken and as I said, I'm skeptical, but hopefull laugh

I'll let everyone know when I get something worth posting, but until then... [Wave]
If I paint a wooden nickel silver... will you buy it for a nickel?

Top
#598441 - 05/05/08 03:13 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8375
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Quote:
Originally posted by X and Halo:
I just wanted to clear up some confusion on basic economics in the oil industry.

1. Oil supply is controlled by a cartel (OPEC). This is a group of oil producers who get together and determine how much they will produce in order to control the price through supply manipulation. They are acting almost like a monopoly, except that they control the price by supply rather than directly setting the price. These countries could increase oil production, but why would they increase supply to drop the price to $28/barrel when people are willing to pay $120/barrel?


OPEC only controls about 50% of the world's oil supply. (That's NOT saying they don't have the power to influence it.)

Quote:
2. The supply of oil has not changed significantly since the start of the Iraq war. The current prices are largely being driven by speculation-people are buying oil futures with the expectation that the price tomorrow will be higher than the price today. It becomes a self-fullfilling prophecy through their continued investments. This market is based more upon fear than supply/demand and rational thought.


Not to mention the lack of refinery capacity. That being said, it's not quite as easy as your explanation. Institutions and investors are buying oil (and other commodities - like Gold going higher in price) as a hedge against the falling dollar. If the dollar starts rebounding, watch the oil prices drop.

Quote:
3. Exxon Mobile had record company profits of 10.9 billion dollars in the first quarter of this year. They paid over 29 billion dollars in federal taxes during this same 3 month period. This means that they only made $1 for every $3 they paid in taxes. And we want to tax them more? It was mentioned earlier that companies pass new costs on to the consumer. Taxing oil companies' profits will NOT drop the price of gasoline, they will pass this increased cost to the consumer--you and me.


You might want to explain that. Only about $10 billion of those taxes were income taxes.

Quote:
4. If you look at Exxon's filings with the SEC, only 8% of their income came from gasoline sales and refining. 92% of their income came from selling oil for other petroleum based products such as plastics. That's right, they made more money from that water bottle you're drinking out of than that last gallon of gas you bought. Gasoline is just the scapegoat.


Which makes one wonder...when will we start seeing glass returnable bottles again?

Quote:
Oil companies make a lot of money. But, they pay a lot of taxes. The price that you are paying at the pump is not controlled by Exxon, as Hillary would have you believe, but by OPEC and the speculators who are buying oil futures today.
Yes, they pay a lot of taxes...but it's not much more than the taxes the richest people pay. Highest personal income tax is what, 38%? Exxon paid 41%.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#598442 - 05/05/08 03:29 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:

Not to mention the lack of refinery capacity.
Who's fault is that? Who prevents this country from building refineries? Who prevents this country from building more nuclear power plants? Who prevents EVERYTHING regarding energy and growth?

You are a member of the primary impediment to all of these things.

Quote:
You might want to explain that. Only about $10 billion of those taxes were income taxes.
You are wrong on the income tax issue. Plus oil... or gasoline and other petroleum products are taxed by the government at varying and multiple stages. One of the largest being at the retail level where multiple governments add up to a total rape of the consumer at the retail level.

Quote:
Which makes one wonder...when will we start seeing glass returnable bottles again?
You won't see that. The environmentalists and the nanny state they control will not allow it. Some child might cut themselves on a glass bottle.

Quote:
Yes, they pay a lot of taxes...but it's not much more than the taxes the richest people pay. Highest personal income tax is what, 38%? Exxon paid 41%.
Rich people rarely pay all of their income through income taxes. [Freak] WTF?

Unless they are idiots, almost none of it is taxed as income.

Income taxes are for employees. People who work for other people and punch a clock.

Rich people's income streams come in the form of capital gains and some of it is even insulated from taxes through trusts and even fraudulent non-profit entities.

Top
#598443 - 05/05/08 04:01 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Madman-

For some people, individuals and companies cannot pay enough taxes. I heard a lady on the radio say that she would pay 75% of her income to the government if we had free healthcare.

People like you and me don't like income taxes. We are getting taxed for being productive members of society. Being a business owner, I get taxed twice; once for my company profits, and yet again on any personal income from the company.

I am much more inclined to pay a consumption tax like the gasoline tax because 1) I am consuming a good and 2) I consume the roads, the traffic lights, and the road maintenance workers so I can get about in a timely manner. I am strictly opposed to an income tax, and I am especially oppposed to taxes being taken from one consumption and used in another area (i.e. property taxes being used for anything else besides public education.)

Top
#598444 - 05/05/08 04:14 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by NY Madman:
Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:

[b]Point taken and as I said, I'm skeptical, but hopefull laugh

I'll let everyone know when I get something worth posting, but until then... [Wave]
If I paint a wooden nickel silver... will you buy it for a nickel?[/b]
Sure, but you'd have more then 5 cents into it, so you'd be the one getting screwed. [LOL]

BTW - Complaining about the price of anything is a little mute. If you need it, you'll buy it at whatever market value it is. If you don't have the money for it, you'll either borrow it, or save it. OR you'll get it through ill gotten means. Either way it is the same in the end, won't effect anything.

Also, I think that "Big Oil" is getting screwed by the masses of whom depend on them for their livelyhood and standard of living.

Let's say it together, "Class Envy" is all this is chocked up to.

Too bad gas isn't cheaper and won't be in my forseeable future as I have a '70 Barth Motorhome I would love to be able to use, but it hasn't been registered since gas was about $1.20. (IIRC) It's cheaper to drive someplace and then rent a room. :rolleyes:

Guess I just have to make more money, but stay under the threshold of paying for everyone else.

Also, I'm surprised I've never seen this Car Running on Water thing here, when there was so much debate on the Plane V. Treadmill. Should be good for at least 100 posts. [LOL] When/If I can make something that works and can prove it, I'll create the thread and watch the sparks fly. [Smoking] [Finger]

Top
#598445 - 05/05/08 04:27 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


They made $30 billion in profit, but that was only a 10% profit, so they didn't do too well relative to their size and investments. They are just such a massive company. Their stock prices fell when their profits were announced.

Top
#598446 - 05/05/08 04:34 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:

Sure, but you'd have more then 5 cents into it, so you'd be the one getting screwed. [LOL]
You can paint a hell of a lot of wooden nickels with a can of spray paint. I wouldn't bet that the face value would be less than the cost of the can of paint.

I think you may be buying a painted wooden nickel with this water kit idea for better gas mileage.

Quote:
Let's say it together, "Class Envy" is all this is chocked up to.
I'm getting very tired of this "class envy" being pushed by certain politicians and the media.

I'm getting even more tired of the public buying into it.

Maybe it is true that this country is finished. If the people of this country think they have a right to what someone else has just because that other person has more... then we are finished. That is not what America used to be about. The sense of entitlement without having earned the right to be entitled is dangerous and destructive.

That is all I hear from the scum running to lead this country.

Quote:
Also, I'm surprised I've never seen this Car Running on Water thing here, when there was so much debate on the Plane V. Treadmill. Should be good for at least 100 posts. [LOL] When/If I can make something that works and can prove it, I'll create the thread and watch the sparks fly. [Smoking] [Finger]
It's a scam. Don't bother.

Top
#598447 - 05/05/08 05:35 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Oh... by the way.... I almost forgot...

North Carolina and Indiana...



May 6, 2008.... VOTE HILLARY CLINTON

The lesser of two large evils

Top
#598448 - 05/05/08 07:10 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8375
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Quote:
Originally posted by NY Madman:

You are a member of the primary impediment to all of these things.


Since when am I a member of that? If you read my post earlier, I said it's the NIMBY crowd.

Quote:
You are wrong on the income tax issue.
Prove me wrong.

Quote:
Plus oil... or gasoline and other petroleum products are taxed by the government at varying and multiple stages. One of the largest being at the retail level where multiple governments add up to a total rape of the consumer at the retail level.


Wasn't talking about the other taxes.

Quote:
Quote:
[b]Which makes one wonder...when will we start seeing glass returnable bottles again?
You won't see that. The environmentalists and the nanny state they control will not allow it. Some child might cut themselves on a glass bottle.
[/b]

I really wouldn't doubt that. I assume as of right now, it's still cheaper to do plastic than glass.

Quote:
Rich people rarely pay all of their income through income taxes. [Freak] WTF?

Unless they are idiots, almost none of it is taxed as income.


I was merely pointing out the tax bracket.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#598449 - 05/05/08 07:43 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:
Quote:
Originally posted by NY Madman:
[b]
Quote:
Originally posted by Conundrum:

[b]Point taken and as I said, I'm skeptical, but hopefull laugh

I'll let everyone know when I get something worth posting, but until then... [Wave]
If I paint a wooden nickel silver... will you buy it for a nickel?[/b]
Sure, but you'd have more then 5 cents into it, so you'd be the one getting screwed. [LOL]

BTW - Complaining about the price of anything is a little mute. If you need it, you'll buy it at whatever market value it is. If you don't have the money for it, you'll either borrow it, or save it. OR you'll get it through ill gotten means. Either way it is the same in the end, won't effect anything.

Also, I think that "Big Oil" is getting screwed by the masses of whom depend on them for their livelyhood and standard of living.

Let's say it together, "Class Envy" is all this is chocked up to.

Too bad gas isn't cheaper and won't be in my forseeable future as I have a '70 Barth Motorhome I would love to be able to use, but it hasn't been registered since gas was about $1.20. (IIRC) It's cheaper to drive someplace and then rent a room. :rolleyes:

Guess I just have to make more money, but stay under the threshold of paying for everyone else.

Also, I'm surprised I've never seen this Car Running on Water thing here, when there was so much debate on the Plane V. Treadmill. Should be good for at least 100 posts. [LOL] When/If I can make something that works and can prove it, I'll create the thread and watch the sparks fly. [Smoking] [Finger] [/b]
Moot...not mute.

Top
#598450 - 05/05/08 07:51 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:

Since when am I a member of that? If you read my post earlier, I said it's the NIMBY crowd.
You're a Democrat and Democrats are the LARGEST impediment to energy independence in this country.

Special interests such as the radical environmentalists are just one of the many destructive special interests that OWN the Democrat Party.

When you smell NIMBY, you are smelling Democrat shit for the most part drifting back in your face. Especially wealthy Democrats.

Quote:
Prove me wrong.
There is nothing to prove to you.

Oil companies have a lower margin than many other businesses. Then their products are taxed to death at varying and numerous intervals during the consumer chain.

What the fuck else is there to talk about? The most highly regulated and taxed industry in the US is the oil and energy business.

That is ALL the fault of liberals. People like you.

Democrats have a plethora of policies they want to institute that will make energy even far more expensive.

Where the fuck is the public debate on all of this? It's non-existent. That is one of the biggest shames and scams in the history of this country.

Quote:
Wasn't talking about the other taxes.
It never seems convenient for liberals to talk about all the taxes levied on a commodity used and needed by the public on a daily basis. It might make someone think liberals are taking advantage of the public.

Quote:
I was merely pointing out the tax bracket.
Who cares about tax brackets? Smart rich people aren't included in tax brackets.

The only people who care about tax brackets are people who pay income tax rates and withholding taxes.

Rich people don't pay "income tax" rates. They are not that stupid. That is why they are rich.

When asshole socialist politicians of your party talk about taxes, they are talking about taxing people who pay income taxes.... not rich people.

There are too many idiots in this country. There is too much corrupt media who don't educate the public as to the difference.

---------------------

Oh... by the way.....

North Carolina and Indiana...



May 6, 2008.... VOTE HILLARY CLINTON

The lesser of two large evils

Top
#598451 - 05/05/08 07:54 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Get a motorcycle or something from these guys: http://www.teslamotors.com. Arguing about gas prices is a lot like arguing about horse buggies. Well, at least it will be in 10 years or so.

Top
#598452 - 05/05/08 08:28 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by whiterussian:

Get a motorcycle or something from these guys: http://www.teslamotors.com. Arguing about gas prices is a lot like arguing about horse buggies. Well, at least it will be in 10 years or so.
Yeah sure.

The federal government spends hundreds of millions of dollars a year giving money to radical environmental groups.

If that money had been spent giving it to companies like Tesla, we may have already had a viable electric car.

You just don't get it. The policy of the Democrat Party is for there to be no viable energy policy.

If we had a viable alternative energy policy... almost the entire Democrat Party energy policy platform would be destroyed and revealed as fraudulent.

There is no advantage to current Democrat Party and environmental lobby policies as far as actually creating an alternative source of energy.

They lose their political power if anything like that came into being.

Political power lies in problems with energy. Not solutions.

Top
#598453 - 05/05/08 08:33 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
Anonymous
Unregistered


Some seem to misunderstand profits vs. gross revenue. Profits are what are left over after taxes and all other expenses are taken away from the gross revenue (the total amount of dollars the company takes in).

I don't want to look back at the Exxon statement for Jan-Mar of this year, but their gross revenues were around $50 billion. After they paid 29.3 billion in taxes (only 10 billion was income tax, the other 20 million came from other royalties and penalties installed by your local Senator), and then took out other expenses, they were left with 10.9 billion in profits.

Their return on investment was 8.3% for the period. All industries in the U.S. averaged a 7.8% return on investment. So, Exxon was slightly above average in their return on investment, but they are statistically in line with every other industry in the nation. We must conclude that they are not profit-gouging, nor making "excessive" profits despite the rantings of Hillary and Obama. Those two do not understand Economics 101.

How many on this forum would be happy with an 8.3% return on the dollars you put into the stock market? I suppose most would fire your stock broker if that's all you got back, yet that's exactly what Exxon got.

Top
#598454 - 05/05/08 08:34 PM Re: .12 / Gal for Gas
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Oh yeah...I forgot..... by the way.....

North Carolina and Indiana...



May 6, 2008.... VOTE HILLARY CLINTON

The lesser of two large evils

Top
Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >



shrockworks xterraparts
XOC Decal