Quote:
Originally posted by Auditor_Kevin:

As was stated earlier, the danger isn't in the likelyhood of a dog to bite - [b]it's in the destruction a dog can do while biting.
[/b]
If in fact it's in the destruction a dog can do while biting well then why the hell have you been singling out pits? I don't think anyone disagrees that a pit can really damage another animal with their bite, but to not mention the sheppard’s, akitas, great danes, rottis, etc... makes me question your statement above. Do you not believe the dogs I mentioned are capable of a maiming bite? News flash, slick. They are and they do.

So,help me understand what the real point of your gripe is. Is it about the
Quote:
Originally posted by Auditor_Kevin:
"dog breed that was originally bred for fighting."
or is it
Quote:
"in the destruction a dog can do while biting."
???????