Originally posted by Mobycat:
So which part of Section 212.6. do you and WND not understand?
Section 212.6 of 777: "Sexual orientation" means heterosexuality, homosexuality, or bisexuality.
Why do focus on this one tiny section?
These bills ban anything that can interpreted as negative or intolerant of homosexuality, bisexuality or any type of "perceived" gender or sexuality issue.
Or more correctly, they can, and will be used to ban numerous things in the CA educational system.
One section that will dictate policy and create a plethora of lawsuits by the homosexual activists to conform to their agenda is....
SEC. 10. Section 219 is added to the Education Code, to read:
219. Disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic contained in the definition of hate crimes set forth in Section 422.55 of the
Penal Code includes a perception that the person has any of those characteristics or that the person is associated with a person who
has, or is perceived to have, any of those characteristics.
That statement right there will be the basis for a plethora of lawsuits designed to control the language and curriculum in CA schools to conform to these activist's agenda.
The words "perceive" and "perception" have no business being included in any law. The latitude for interpretation and judicial activism is almost unlimited.
Add the following section and any claim of discrimination can be made for any terms used in text and even any activities that may take place in a school.
SEC. 11. Section 220 of the Education Code is amended to read:
220. No person shall be subjected to discrimination on the basis of disability, gender, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in
the definition of hate crimes set forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution that receives, or benefits from, state financial
assistance or enrolls pupils who receive state student financial aid.
Then take a look at the following section in the bill AB 394....
234. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Safe
Place to Learn Act.
(b) It is the policy of the State of California to ensure that all school districts and schools local educational agencies continue to work to reduce discrimination, harassment, and violence. It is further the policy of the state to improve pupil safety at schools and the connections between pupils and supportive adults, schools, and communities.
234.1. The department, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 64001, shall monitor adherence to the requirements of Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 4900) of Division 1 of Title 5 of the
California Code of Regulations and Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 200) as part of its regular monitoring and review of public schools and school districts local educational
agencies , commonly known as the Categorical Program Monitoring process. The department shall assess whether schools local educational agencies have done all of the following:
(a) Adopted a policy that prohibits discrimination and harassment based on the characteristics set forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code and Section 220.
(b) Adopted a process for receiving and investigating complaints of discrimination and harassment based on the characteristics set
forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code and Section 220.
(c) Publicized antidiscrimination and antiharassment policies, including information about the manner in which to file a complaint,
to pupils, parents, employees, agents of the governing board, and the general public. The information shall be translated pursuant to
Section 48985.
(d) Posted antidiscrimination and antiharassment policies in all schools and offices, including staff lounges and pupil government meeting rooms.
(c)
(e) Maintained documentation of complaints and their resolution for a minimum of one review cycle .
(d)
(f) Ensured that complainants are protected from retaliation and that the identity of a complainant alleging discrimination or harassment remains confidential, as appropriate.
(g) Identified a responsible local educational agency officer for ensuring district or office compliance with the requirements of
Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 4900) of Division 1 of Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations and Chapter 2 (commencing with
Section 200).
234.2. The department shall display information on curricula and other resources that specifically address bias-related discrimination
and harassment based on the characteristics set forth in Section 422.55 of the Penal Code and Section 220 on the California Healthy Kids Resource Center Internet Web site and other appropriate department Internet Web sites where information about discrimination
and harassment is posted.
234.3. The department shall develop a model handout describing the rights and obligations set forth in Sections 200, 201, and 220 and the policies addressing bias-related discrimination and harassment in schools. This model handout shall be posted on appropriate department Internet Web sites.
That is basically a blueprint for a complete overhaul and forced indoctrination.
There is also a most troubling aspect of this where a person being accused of discrimination does not have to face their accuser.
The law even sets up a Gestapo to oversee all of this across the state.
This is complete bullshit and the squashing of people's liberties all disguised as "tolerance" and non-discrimination.
There is so much that is wrong with these bills.
Previous Topic
Index
