From the egomaniac, Justice Breyer's dissent.....

"The argument about method, however, is by far the less important argument surrounding today’s decision. Far more important are the unfortunate consequences that today’s decision is likely to spawn. Not least of these, as I have said, is the fact that the decision threatens to throw into doubt the constitutionality of gun laws throughout the United States. I can find no sound legal basis for launching the courts on so formidable and potentially dangerous a mission."

He is wrong about that. I even wonder if he was even aware of the contents of the majority opinion.

The majority opinion clearly stated that the decision applies to federal law. It also stated that government has a right to make restrictions regarding gun ownership.

The decision also doesn't incorporate itself onto the states.

How did this fucking guy get to the Supreme Court?

He went on to say....

"In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas."

Justice Stevens wrote the dissenting opinion for the group but Breyer had to stick in his two cents.

These left wing justices clearly believe that American citizens have no right to defend themselves in their homes with firearms.

That sentiment repeats itself numerous times throughout the dissent. It also doesn't even include the caveat of "crime ridden areas" when mentioned previously.

This country is surely in for very scary times in the future if these people get control of all three branches of government.