I've been reading the dissent this morning and one thing seems to pop out. Some of the state constitutions he cites as indicating the second ammendment is referring to "the people" as a collective, require that the state provide arms and training to the people and that those individual who do not wish to comply must pay a fee. Is that kind of the basis behind the civilian marksmanship program? Surely it wasn't just a way to get rid of surplus weapons.