The only real issue I have with what he says is this:

Quote:
She has specifically refused to rule out a big increase in Social Security (FICA) taxes. This levy is currently enforced on the first $97,000 of income. Hillary would probably follow the lead of Democratic liberals and either raise the limit — at least doubling it — or eliminating it altogether. A self-employed American making $250,000 a year currently pays $12,125 in FICA taxes (12.5 percent x $97,000). If the threshold were eliminated, his FICA tax would jump to $31,250!
Regardless of what you may think of Social Security, it is FAR from a fair tax.

He doesn't mention that anyone making $97,000 will STILL only pay $12,125. How many people make more than $97,000? Very few.

Much like the estate tax, they prey on people's fears: "Look at the DEATH TAX!!" Even though VERY few people are affected by it.

(I'm not arguing whether there should be an estate tax or not - just that they are VERY misleading when they argue about it.)
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist