shrockworks xterraparts
XOC Decal
Newest Members
Glim, ChossWrangler, Patman, ChargedX, Randy Howerton
10084 Registered Users
Recent Posts
ECXC 2024!
by Tom
23/04/24 04:27 PM
2002 Door Opening Trim
by OffroadX
01/04/24 08:32 PM
XOC Still Lives
by OffroadX
01/04/24 08:31 PM
Shout Box

Who's Online
0 registered (), 113 Guests and 0 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 9 of 11 < 1 2 ... 7 8 9 10 11 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#607560 - 12/11/07 04:53 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


What's really sad (for the "can't fly" crowd), though, is that even a car, who IS powered through the tires, will move forward on the conveyor belt... His speedometer won't accurately show how fast he's moving, though, 'cause his tires will have to spin twice as fast to obtain the same true speed.

Case in point: your speedo is just a calculation of how fast your tires are rotating. It isn't necessarily reflect how fast you are actually moving. Do a burnout, and your speedo says you're going 30+ mph. The reality of it is, you aren't moving at all.

Moving is actual moving. Not angular velocity of tires. So if the plane is MOVING, then it is ACTUALLY MOVING... Guess the "can't fly" crowd doesn't understand what "Moving" means...

Top
#607561 - 12/11/07 05:33 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by porsche996:
Quote:
Originally posted by vitaly:
[b]Now let's assume, it's not a plane but an ostrich running on the treadmill.
The take-off speed of the ostrich is 120mph, and the treadmill is moving backwards at 80mph.
How fast does the ostrich have to run in order to take off?
He has to run 200 MPH EQUIVALENT, or 120 mph ACTUAL. If he had an internal speedo, it'd say 200 mph, and to the ostrich, it doesn't really matter, 'cause he can't fly in the first fucking place. He's an ostrich.

[Finger] [/b]
I believe an ostrich actually CAN take off at 120mph. [Wave]

Top
#607562 - 12/11/07 05:53 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8374
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Quote:
Originally posted by RiverPig:
Quote:
The treadmill continues at 80mph in reverse direction as the plane. BUT, you'll notice, the tires of the plane are now revolving at 160 mph.

So, multiple choice question:

The plane at this time is now moving at:

(A) 0 mph
(B) 80 mph
(C) 160 mph
If the tires are going 160mph how fast is the treadmill going?
Here's where you aren't getting it.

The treadmill is moving at 160mph relative to the plane's speed. The treadmill is moving at 80mph relative to you standing on the ground next to it.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#607563 - 12/11/07 06:18 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
XPLORx4 Offline
Member

Registered: 23/03/01
Posts: 1906
Loc: San Jose, CA
Quote:
Originally posted by vitaly:
I believe an ostrich actually CAN take off at 120mph. [Wave]
I'd like to see Mythbusters take that one on! [ThumbsUp]
_________________________
4x4 in uppercase is $X$!!!
1997 R50: VG33E/RE4R01A/TX10/3.7/R200A/ARB/4.636/H233B/ARB/4.636/321150R15

Top
#607564 - 12/11/07 06:20 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
XPLORx4 Offline
Member

Registered: 23/03/01
Posts: 1906
Loc: San Jose, CA
I simply CANNOT believe that yet another thread on this issue has surfaced! I bet that even after Mythbusters CONFIRMS that the plane will fly, the "can't fly" crowd will find some problem with their methods in order to hold fast to their belief that the plane won't fly.
_________________________
4x4 in uppercase is $X$!!!
1997 R50: VG33E/RE4R01A/TX10/3.7/R200A/ARB/4.636/H233B/ARB/4.636/321150R15

Top
#607565 - 12/11/07 06:30 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by XPLORx4:
I simply [b]CANNOT believe that yet another thread on this issue has surfaced! I bet that even after Mythbusters CONFIRMS that the plane will fly, the "can't fly" crowd will find some problem with their methods in order to hold fast to their belief that the plane won't fly.[/b]
The funny part is, even if the Mythbusters set the treadmill faster than the planes takeoff ground speed, the can't fly crowd would freak and say that it wasn't a valid test because the treadmill was moving too fast [Freak]

Top
#607566 - 12/11/07 06:47 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by ChefTyler:
Quote:
Originally posted by XPLORx4:
[b]I simply [b]CANNOT believe that yet another thread on this issue has surfaced! I bet that even after Mythbusters CONFIRMS that the plane will fly, the "can't fly" crowd will find some problem with their methods in order to hold fast to their belief that the plane won't fly.[/b]
The funny part is, even if the Mythbusters set the treadmill faster than the planes takeoff ground speed, the can't fly crowd would freak and say that it wasn't a valid test because the treadmill was moving too fast [Freak] [/b]
...and created a vacuum behind the plane which propelled it down the runway - which otherwise would not occur if the treadmill would precisely match the speed of the craft.

Top
#607567 - 12/11/07 06:47 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Quote:
Originally posted by XPLORx4:

I simply [b]CANNOT believe that yet another thread on this issue has surfaced! I bet that even after Mythbusters CONFIRMS that the plane will fly, the "can't fly" crowd will find some problem with their methods in order to hold fast to their belief that the plane won't fly.[/b]
I'm always kind of shocked that many people have so much faith in this show "Mythbusters".

It is entertainment. It is NOT science.

They have been wrong and will continue to be wrong on things.

And... I'm not talking about the plane/treadmill thing. I am just talking about the show "Mythbusters" in general.

Top
#607568 - 12/11/07 07:16 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by vitaly:
Quote:
Originally posted by porsche996:
[b]
Quote:
Originally posted by vitaly:
[b]Now let's assume, it's not a plane but an ostrich running on the treadmill.
The take-off speed of the ostrich is 120mph, and the treadmill is moving backwards at 80mph.
How fast does the ostrich have to run in order to take off?
He has to run 200 MPH EQUIVALENT, or 120 mph ACTUAL. If he had an internal speedo, it'd say 200 mph, and to the ostrich, it doesn't really matter, 'cause he can't fly in the first fucking place. He's an ostrich.

[Finger] [/b]
I believe an ostrich actually CAN take off at 120mph. [Wave] [/b]
I don't know for certain, but it'd be a helluva' show!

Top
#607569 - 12/11/07 07:19 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


I get trolled for saying that the plane will take off.

Kick-ass! laugh laugh [drink]

Top
#607570 - 12/11/07 07:37 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Who said I can't fly?


Top
#607571 - 12/11/07 09:27 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by JeffW:

Anybody who can't understand a simple High School Physics problem doesn't need anybody to make them look stupid. They're doing a pretty good job on their own.......... [Huh?]
You are oversimplifying things. The classic Newtonian mechanics stops working as soon as the treadmill is powered.
The plane will stay stationary until the wheels reach relativistic angular velocity, then it will disappear and pop up at a random point of the Universe.

Top
#607572 - 12/11/07 09:58 PM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by vitaly:
The plane will stay stationary until the wheels reach relativistic angular velocity, then it will disappear and pop up at a random point of the Universe.
Finally, an answer that makes sense.

Top
#607573 - 13/11/07 04:33 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
TravelingFool Offline
Member

Registered: 17/10/00
Posts: 6013
Loc: Prior Lake, MN
The wheels don't provide ANY forward momentum to the plane. If the jet engines are going, the plane will move forward and take off no matter what's under the wheels. Think about a seaplane taking off against the current of a river, its no problem at all. Ever wonder why the jet dragsters don't do burnouts at the drag strip? Hello?

The "It won't fly" crowd is probably the same crowd who bought all of Suzanne Sommers' thigh masters... Mom used to say, "the world needs dumb people to make the rest of us look smart."
_________________________
kjw &
the PNUTMNM

The liver is evil, and must be punished...

Top
#607574 - 13/11/07 07:16 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


My official response is that there is not enough information in the question

Quote:
A plane is standing on a runway that can move (like a giant conveyor
belt). This conveyor has a control system that tracks the plane's
speed and tunes the speed of the conveyor to be exactly the same (but
in the opposite direction).

Will the plane be able to take off?
Since the plane is standing on the runway the net movement would be 0 therefore the plane would not take off.

If the question assumes that the plane makes an effort to move forward and the treadmill matches spead of the fusalage..sp? then the plane would take off. The best explanation for this would be that there is a rope attached to the back of the plane that runs to a pulley that attaches to the front of the treadmill as plane moves forward the treadmill would turn back at exact speed that the plane moves forward.

If the treadmill is matching the speed of the plane based on the speed of the tires then the plane would remain static and would not take off .

Top
#607575 - 13/11/07 07:48 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


How can the plane have any speed to match if it's stationary?

Your rope-driven-conveyor is bogus, as that totally changes the scenario and adds a whole lot more friction to overcome. Besides, a traditional drivetrain in a piston-prop might work to drive a conveyor, but how would you accomplish that with a turboprop or jet? A big honkin windmill? still wouldn't keep the plane on the ground.

Top
#607576 - 13/11/07 07:54 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


I was using the rope driven conveyor as an example much like the touch and go and all the toehr stuff people have been using as examples.

Top
#607577 - 13/11/07 07:56 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8374
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Quote:
Originally posted by RiverPig:
My official response is that there is not enough information in the question


Very true - it does not say whether the conveyor belt (or treadmill or whatever) matches the planes speed relative to the ground or to itself.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#607578 - 13/11/07 08:00 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Neither matters.

Top
#607579 - 13/11/07 08:05 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
NY Madman Offline
Member
*

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 5232
Loc: Florida
Here you go.....

583 pages and over 2 years arguing about the plane on a conveyor belt...

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=2417&st=0

Top
#607580 - 13/11/07 09:05 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8374
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Quote:
Originally posted by MattyX:
Neither matters.
Actually, it does.

If the plane's speed is relative to the belt, the ONLY speed that can be matched by the belt is zero. Otherwise, it's caught in a infinite speed curve up (meaning the belt can't match it). Example - if the plane is moving 2mph relative to the belt, the belt has to go 2mph in the opposite direction - but then the plane is actually moving at 4mph relative to the belt - then the belt has to go 4mph...but then the plane is going 8mph relative to the belt...and so on and so on.

If the plane's speed is relative to the ground, then it takes off no problem, and the belt can match it's speed. In which case, the belt has absolutely no bearing on the plane's movement.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#607581 - 13/11/07 09:46 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


If speed is relative to the belt, then the plane moves forward on the belt at a rate of 10 knots over the belt, the belt spins backwards at 10 knots, and the plane moves forward just the same. That in turn increases the relative speed of the aircraft. Situation: entirely impossible. Even if it were, the plane would still take off.

You're right when you say the only speed the belt could match was zero.

Still doesn't matter, the plane takes off.

::ETA:: even with constant exponential acceleration of the belt, the plane can overcome the minimal friction of the conveyor under its free-spinning wheels.

Top
#607582 - 13/11/07 09:47 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Mobycat Offline
Member
*****

Registered: 12/09/00
Posts: 8374
Loc: the hue of dungeons and the sc...
Exactly.
_________________________
"Nature has constituted utility to man the standard and test of virtue. Men living in different countries, under different circumstances, different habits and regimens, may have different utilities; the same act, therefore, may be useful and consequently virtuous in one country which is injurious and vicious in another differently circumstanced" - Thomas Jefferson, moral relativist

Top
#607583 - 13/11/07 09:52 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


Quote:
Originally posted by Mobycat:
Quote:
Originally posted by MattyX:
[b]Neither matters.
Actually, it does.
...
[/b]
Why is it so hard to comprehend that the only speed that matters is the speed of the plane relative to air? Not to the observer, not to the treadmill, not to the ground, not to your uncle, nothing else, but the AIR.
[Argue]

Top
#607584 - 13/11/07 10:43 AM Re: Airplane on a treadmill question
Anonymous
Unregistered


if the speed of the treadmill is the same as the speed that the tires are spinning then the plane will not move if the plane is moving forward then the tires are spinning faster than the treadmill is going

Top
Page 9 of 11 < 1 2 ... 7 8 9 10 11 >



shrockworks xterraparts
XOC Decal